A DREAM DEFERRED!

 

 

What would Dr. King do if he were alive today now that his "signature" accomplishment (Section 4 of The Voting Rights Act of 1965) which he fought and “died” for has been struck down by the Supreme Court? What would Dr. King think about the civil rights leaders of today? America (not just Black America) needs to take another look at the leadership that we entrust with the sacred task of gaurding the civil rights of the American People. For far too long we have witnessed the "decay" of our leadership, from honorable and selfless men and women of the people, to narcissistic "capitalist" who are for sale to any corporate interest willing to stack their pockets full of cash. Selling out to the highest bidder and not even considering the consequences of their actions.

 

The people we have at the helm of our top civil rights organizations are more like "money grabbing opportunist” than civil rights leaders, feathering their own nest while the masses of poor and disenfranchised people suffer under the yoke of a corrupt government stemming from the executive, legislative and (as we just witnessed today with the decision from the Supreme Court) the judicial branches of our government.  The  four (4) top civil rights organizations are (1) The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), (2) The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), (3) The National Action Network (NAN) and (4) The National Urban League (NUL). Back in 1965 when the landmark Voting Rights Act was signed into law by President Johnson, three of these organizations were very active in the human condition and the civil rights of Blacks in this country. However, today these organizations seem to be more interested in the rights of undocumented immigrants and the LGBT community. Although both worthy and honorable causes, Black men in this country are suffering unemployment and mass incarceration at a crises level. The National Action Network was not yet founded back in 1965, but I don’t believe that the organizations leader and founder, the Rev. Al Sharpton would have been warmly accepted back then with the corporate connections  he has today.

 

Reverend Sharpton (in my opinion) is a “corporate” sponsored civil rights leader.  Rev. Sharpton has a lucrative cable talk show and several lucrative “syndicated” radio talk shows. To put it bluntly, the Reverend Al Sharpton is a “millionaire” civil rights leader who used the tragedies in mostly poor Black communities to catapult himself into the lifestyle of an aristocrat. This is a “sin” against the poor people that trusted him to represent their interest. This is a man that sees no contradiction in demanding justice from corporate abuses (as he did in the Don Imus debacle) and peddling “penis” boosting pills for these same coporate interest on his radio shows. As the leaders of major civil rights organizations, they receive 6 or 7 figure salaries and collect income from sitting on the Boards of other Companies and Organizations. This wouldn’t be so bad if these organizations were actually getting things done. In the 60’s, these same organizations had less funding yet helped pass landmark legislation like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and they got a White President to support and sign these Bills into law. Today, these same agencies cannot even get a Black President to even “mention” the plight of Black folk much less force him to support, advocate and sign any bill into law that is centered around the Black condition. Furthermore, Police abuses, stop and frisk, unemployment and mass incarceration are worse than they were back in the 60’s. In fact, Black people are doing the same or worst than we were doing in the harsh times of Jim Crow. The civil rights leaders of the 60’s where men and women of “modest” means. Certainly, great orators as Dr. King and Malcolm X were, could have easily hosted television and radio shows and earned truck loads of money, yet, money was not the motive for their activism. I truly do not think that Dr. King would be impressed with the leadership of today. Dr. King deserves better, El Hajj Malik El Shabazz (Malcolm X) deserves better. Medgar Evers deserves better. A Phillip Randolph deserves better. The spirit of the countless hero’s and shero’s of the civil rights movement deserves better. The American people deserve better.

 

Eric M. Deadwiley is a Freelance Op-Ed Columnist, Investigative Reporter and Author of "Civil Death in New York State, How New York State Utilizes Criminal Conviction Records to impede the Economic Growth of Formerly Convicted People"

 

Contact:         Eric M. Deadwiley

Email               thedeadwileytruth@yahoo.com

Blog:               http://civildeathinnewyorkstate.blogspot.com/

 

 
 




 


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CONTACT TRACER RECRUITMENT DISCRIMINATION

Dear Leaders in the New York City Area, I am concerned that Mayor Bill Di Blasio's decision to pass the hiring of the estimated seventeen hundred Contact Tracers to Ex-Mayor Bloomberg will result in discriminatory hiring practices that will ill affect African American and Latino communities. Bloomberg “immediately” announced that he would turn the hiring process over to a “Staffing Agency.” Many of these “Staffing Agencies” use all types of software that “sifts-out” candidates based on name, demographics, race and word use. It has been well established that the African American and Latino community has been adversely affected by the Covid-19 Virus in New York State. Our community should be 1 st priority in these well-paying jobs which start at $57,000.00. It should be very suspicious that one of the job qualifications is that a person must have prior “healthcare experience.” The Contact Tracer position is basically an "investigatory" position. Other States are ...
Read more

DO WE DESERVE TO RECEIVE A DIVIDEND FOR OUR INVESTMENT?

THE DEADWILEY TRUTH OP-ED COLUMN Do We Deserve to Receive a Dividend for our Investment ? By Eric M. Deadwiley Look People! Anyone could see that our first Black President is ignoring the plight and struggle of black people. Rising tides certainly did not lift up the black ships. Professor Cornel West is right. President Obama is surrounded by oligarchs and "Elitist." President Obama had to know that his election to the presidency would cause a white "Back-lash" on black people all around the country. Nowhere is this back-lash more evident than in New York City where I live.   However, there are things which President Obama could have done (and still can do) to help the masses of blacks suffering under this back-lash from other ethnic group’s that backed Hillary Clinton and did not want to see a black man as President. The President has executive powers that he has not utilized. With a swipe of a pin, he can sign “Executive orders” to launch commissions to study w...
Read more

"BAN THE BOX" BILLS INTRODUCED IN NYS SENATE AND ASSEMBLY

“Ban the Box” Bills Introduced in NYS Senate and Assembly By Eric M. Deadwiley June 7, 2011 On April 20, 2011, I faxed a copy of a proposal to every member of the Corrections Committee in the New York State Assembly and members of the New York State Senate.   The proposal was to introduce a “Ban the Box” bill in New York State. As a result of this proposal, I received a call on May 16, 2011 from Ms. Sandy Stewart from New York State Senator Velmanette Montgomery’s office informing me that because of my proposal and the urging of other advocates, Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson, of the 36 th Senate District will be introducing a Ban the Box bill in the Senate to correspond with Assemblyman Jeffrion Aubry’s Ban the Box bill in the NYS Assembly.   I am delighted to report that New York State Senate bill #S5427 , sponsored by Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson of the 36 th Senate District, and NYS Assembly bill #A07782 sponsored by Assembly-member Jeffrion L. Aubry of the 35 th Asse...
Read more